ZHANG Jin, XIONG Yi, NIE Xin
ObjectiveBy statistical analysis of the weekly test results of 4 medical electron linear accelerators in the past 3 years, to find and summarize the regularity and characteristics of periodic quality control of accelerators, so as to provide recommendations for the rational maintenance of accelerators and radiotherapy for cancer patients. Methods According to the quality control content recommended by domestic and foreign reports and literatures, five items such as output dose stability, laser lamp position, image center and mechanical center coincidence test, optical distance scale accuracy and optical field size were selected to carry out periodic inspection work. Results The four accelerators were American Varian Trilogy (old), Swedish Elekta Precise, American Varian Unique and American Varian Trilogy (new) in order of service time. The passing rates of the output dose test were 97.5%, 93.2%, 96.3% and 100%, respectively. The average maximum deviation of laser lamp position was 0.84, 0.76, 0.82 and 0.64 mm, respectively. The average maximum deviation of the coincidence degree between image center and mechanical center was 1.19, 1.05, 0.83 and 0.81 mm, respectively. The average maximum deviation was 1.05, 0.72, 1.72 and 0.91 mm, respectively. The average maximum deviation of optical field size was 0.91, 0.82, 0.79 and 0.60 mm, respectively. Varian Trilogy (new), the shortest-serving and highest-configuration accelerator, ranked in the top two for each of the four accelerators in the horizontal rankings, while all the others ranked in the bottom for at least one test. Conclusion The shorter the service time of the medical electron linear accelerator weekly inspection project, the higher the comprehensive standard rate, more suitable for the implementation of more complex treatment plans, to undertake more radiotherapy tasks. In addition, the higher the accelerator configuration produced by the same company, the higher the output dose stability and the accuracy of the optical gauge. The position of laser light in the horizontal direction of each accelerator is more prone to deviation. The more C-arm accelerators participate in image guidance, the greater the probability of image center deviation. The greater the difference from 100 cm, the greater the probability of deviation.