Comparison Between Filtered Back Projection Versus Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction in 
Pediatric Phantom Chest CT Using Low-Concentration Iodinated Contrast Agent and
Low Tube Voltage and Current

HU Liweia; ZHU Yaxin; LIU Alia; DU Juna; CAO Shaopinb; ZHONG Yumina

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2020.04.014

Comparison Between Filtered Back Projection Versus Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction in Pediatric Phantom Chest CT Using Low-Concentration Iodinated Contrast Agent and Low Tube Voltage and Current

HU Liwei^1a, ZHU Yaxin² , LIU Ali^1a, DU Jun^1a, CAO Shaopin^1b, ZHONG Yumin^1a

China Medical Devices ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 52-54.

PDF(1617 KB)

China Medical Devices ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 52-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2020.04.014

CLINICAL IMAGING ECHNOLOGY

Comparison Between Filtered Back Projection Versus Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction in Pediatric Phantom Chest CT Using Low-Concentration Iodinated Contrast Agent and Low Tube Voltage and Current

{{article.zuoZhe_EN}}

Author information +

History +

HeighLight

Abstract

Key words

QR code of this article

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

{{article.zuoZheEn_L}}. {{article.title_en}}[J]. {{journal.qiKanMingCheng_EN}}, 2020, 35(4): 52-54 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2020.04.014

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

References

Funding

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

PDF(1617 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections

Recommended

Received	Published
2019-08-27	2020-04-10
Issue Date
2020-06-23

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export