Preliminarily Investigation of Optimization of Imaging Parameters in Digital Mammography System

MIN Gao-yu, HU Yi-bin, JIN Xi-jun, LI Da-peng, LI Ming-ming

China Medical Devices ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12) : 41-44.

PDF(2811 KB)
PDF(2811 KB)
China Medical Devices ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12) : 41-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2015.12.011
RESEARCH WORK

Preliminarily Investigation of Optimization of Imaging Parameters in Digital Mammography System

  • MIN Gao-yu1a, HU Yi-bin1a, JIN Xi-jun1a, LI Da-peng1b, LI Ming-ming2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective Optimizing imaging parameters in digital mammography system was preliminarily investigated in this paper. Methods The 4-cm-thick PMMA (Poly-Methyl-Meth-Acrylate) breast simulating phantom was used, and two different combinations of anode/filter material and a wide range of peak tube voltage and tube current-time product were employed for manually imaging. The images were analyzed by using a set of plug-in applications in the ImageJ software for acquisition of the pixel mean value and standard deviation measurements so as to calculate contrast noise ratio. Then, the impact of combination of anode/filter material, peak tube voltage and tube current-time product on images was assessed by using contrast noise ration and mean glandular dose.

Key words

digital mammography system / combination of Mo/Rh / combination of Mo/Mo / contrast to noise ratio / mean glandular dose

Cite this article

Download Citations
MIN Gao-yu, HU Yi-bin, JIN Xi-jun, et al. Preliminarily Investigation of Optimization of Imaging Parameters in Digital Mammography System[J]. China Medical Devices, 2015, 30(12): 41-44 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2015.12.011

References

[1] Ferlay J,Shin HR,Bray F,et al.Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide:IARC Cancer Base No.10.GLOBOCAN 2008[M]. Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer,2010. [2] Andersson I,Ikeda DM,Zackrisson S,et al.Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography:a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings[J].Eur Radiol,2008,18(12):2817- 2825. [3] Ragozzino M.Optimal photon energies with respect to absorbed dose for visualization of soft tissue masses with adipose tissue[J].Med Phys,1982,9(4):493-496. [4] Bernhardt P,Batz L,Ruhrnschopf E,et al.Spatial frequencydependent signal-to-noise ratio as a generalized measure of image quality[J].Proc of the SPIE,2005,5745:407-418. [5] Bottigli U,Bolosio B,Masala G,et al.Effect of different spectral distributions to image a contrast detail phantom in the mammography energy range[J].Nuovo Cimento della Societa Italiana di Fisica,2006,29(2):215-228. [6] Oliva P,Golosio B,Stumbo S,et al.Compact X-ray sources for mammographic applications:Monte Carlo simulations of image quality[J].Med Phys,2009,36(11):5149-5161. [7] Oliva P,Bacci A,Bottigli U,et al.Start-to-end simulation of a Thomson source for mammography[J].Nuclear Instrumments and Methods in Physics,2010,615(1):93-99.
PDF(2811 KB)

600

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/