医用麻醉机临床使用评价模型的研究

黄浩,朱毅,陈军,张斌,李维,潘宗玮,杨东明

中国医疗设备 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 102-106.

PDF(2325 KB)
PDF(2325 KB)
中国医疗设备 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 102-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.20241130
研究论著

医用麻醉机临床使用评价模型的研究

  • 黄浩a,朱毅a,陈军a,张斌a,李维b,潘宗玮a,杨东明a
作者信息 +

Research on the Clinical Use Evaluation Model of Medical Anesthesia Machine

  • HUANG Haoa, ZHU Yia, CHEN Juna, ZHANG Bina, LI Weib, PAN Zongweia, YANG Dongminga
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 根据对医院医用麻醉机使用情况的调查与分析,预建立一套科学的医用麻醉机使用评价体系,为采购、管理 决策提供理论依据,以供科学管理。方法 利用德尔菲专家咨询法进行2轮专家咨询,通过研讨小组讨论得到4个一级指标、 11个二级指标及35个三级指标,将指标设计成调研问卷,定向邀请咨询专家填写,对结果进行统计分析。结果 经过2轮 专家咨询调研显示,一级指标依次为技术性能(35.23%)、临床使用效果(32.79%)、经济效益(17.41%)、售后服务 (14.56%);对应的二级指标中关注度较高的指标:安全性、稳定性、可靠性、厂家服务能力、可维护性、采购成本及投资回报;三级指标的得分平均值在3.99~4.75分之间,34个指标的标准差均<1 ,变异系数均 <0.25。 结论 本研究基于医用麻醉机的全生命周期管理,综合技术特性、临床应用、经济管理及使用行为等多维度建立了较为全面的评价体系,可以为医用麻醉机采购、管理提供参考依据。

Abstract

Objective To establish a scientific evaluation system for the use of medical anesthesia machines based on the investigation and analysis of the usage of medical anesthesia machines in the hospital, to provide a theoretical basis for procurement and management decisions for scientific management. Methods Two rounds of expert consultations were conducted using the Delphi expert consultation method. Through discussions in the group, 4 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 35 third-level indicators were obtained. The indicators were designed into research questionnaires, and consulting experts were invited specifically to fill them out. The results were statistically analyzed. Results After two rounds of expert consultation and research, it was shown that the first-level indicators were technical performance (35.23%), clinical application effect (32.79%), economic benefit (17.41%), and after-sales service (14.56%) in sequence. Among the corresponding secondary indicators, the ones with relatively high attention were: safety, stability, reliability, manufacturer service capability, maintainability, procurement cost and return on investment. The average scores of the third-level indicators ranged from 3.99 to 4.75 points. The standard deviations of 34 indicators were less than 1, and the coefficient of variation were less than 0.25. Conclusion Based on the full life cycle management of medical anesthesia machines, this study has established a relatively comprehensive evaluation system from multiple dimensions such as technical characteristics, clinical applications, economic management, and usage behaviors, which can provide a reference basis for the procurement and management of medical anesthesia machines.

关键词

医用麻醉机;使用评价模型;德尔菲专家咨询法;指标权重;安全性;稳定性;可靠性

Key words

medical anesthesia machine; use evaluation model; Delphi expert consultation method; index weight; safety; stability; reliability

引用本文

导出引用
黄浩, 朱毅, 陈军, . 医用麻醉机临床使用评价模型的研究[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2025, 40(5): 102-106 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.20241130
HUANG Hao, ZHU Yi, CHEN Jun, et al. Research on the Clinical Use Evaluation Model of Medical Anesthesia Machine[J]. China Medical Devices, 2025, 40(5): 102-106 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.20241130
中图分类号: R197.39   

参考文献


[1] 高文亮. 浅谈医用麻醉机的维修和维护保养[J]. 中国设备工程, 2024(3): 79-81.
[2] 高国彪, 张世庆, 潘硕, 等. 创新医疗器械政策现状及发展路径探讨[J]. 中国食品药品监管, 2024(9): 6-15.
Gao GB, Zhang SQ, Pan S, et al. Discussion on the current situation and development path for innovative medical devices[J]. China Food Drug Adm Mag, 2024(9): 6-15.
[3] International Electrotechnical Commission. Application of risk management for IT-networks incorporating medical devices - part 1: safety, effectiveness and security in the implementation and use of connected medical devices or connected health software: IEC 80001-1:2021[S]. 2021.
[4] 国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所. 基于真实世界证据的医疗器械临床使用评价指南(2.0版)[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2022.
[5] 国务院. 医疗器械监督管理条例[EB/OL]. (2021-02-09)[2024-10-30]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2021/ content_5595920.htm.
[6] 国家卫生健康委员会. 医疗器械临床使用管理办法[EB/OL]. (2021-01-12)[2024-10-30]. https://www.gov.cn/ zhengce/2021-01/12/content_5713746.htm.
[7] 郑凡, 蔡玉娥, 张攀攀. 两种缝合方法在创伤整形手术患者中的应用及美容效果对比分析[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2018, 8(11): 44-47.
Zheng F, Cai YE, Zhang PP. Application of two suture methods in patients with traumatic plastic surgery and comparative analysis of cosmetic effects[J]. China Med Cosmetol, 2018, 8(11): 44-47.
[8] 张爽, 叶红, 童琳, 等. 可吸收止血材料的体外抑菌和止血效果评价[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2022, 37(5): 141-145.
Zhang S, Ye H, Tong L, et al. Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial and hemostatic effect of absorbable hemostatic materials[J]. China Med Devices, 2022, 37(5): 141-145.
[9] 王泽华, 孟颖, 盛恒松, 等. 外周血管刻痕或切割球囊扩张导管的临床应用及审评思考[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2023, 38(7): 159-163.
Wang ZH, Meng Y, Sheng HS, et al. Review of clinical application studies on peripheral artery scoring/cutting balloon dilation catheters[J]. China Med Devices, 2023, 38(7): 159-163.
[10] 刘芳, 杨安怀. 国产可折叠人工晶体用于白内障手术的多中心临床试验[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2022, 43(1): 158-163.
Liu F, Yang AH. Multi-center clinical trial of domestic foldable intraocular lens for cataract surgery[J]. Med J Wuhan Univ, 2022, 43(1): 158-163.
[11] 吉良燕. Etesia麻醉机有效性和安全性临床评价[J]. 中科技期刊数据库(文摘版)医药卫生, 2023(9): 77-80.
[12] 黄爱兰, 朱蔚琳, 秦岭, 等. 临床使用中麻醉机安全性评价[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2009, 38(9): 1197-1198.
Huang AL, Zhu WL, Qin L, et al. Primary the methods to evaluat the security of anesthesia machine during operation[J]. Shaanxi Med J, 2009, 38(9): 1197-1198.
[13] 闫作骞. 浅谈医疗设备的全生命周期管理[J]. 中国设备工程, 2023(17): 75-77.
[14] 刘毅, 王浩, 李澍, 等. 人工智能医疗器械企业质量管理体系构建关键指标筛选研究[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2021, 36(3): 24-27.
Liu Y, Wang H, Li S, et al. Research on key indicators screening for quality management system construction of artificial intelligence medical device enterprises[J]. China Med Devices, 2021, 36(3): 24-27.
[15] 江婧. 医疗人工智能应用中的伦理问题研究[D]. 广州: 广州中医药大学, 2023.
Jiang J. Research on ethical issues in the application of medical artificial intellifence[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 2023.
[16] 李秀涛, 谭理连, 邱绍清, 等. 人工智能在早期胸部CT肋骨骨折的临床应用价值及局限性分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(10): 115-118.
Li XT, Tan LL, Qiu SQ, et al. Clinical application value and limitation analysis of artificial intelligence in early thoracic CT for rib fractures[J]. Chin J CT MRI, 2023, 21(10): 115-118.
[17] 李元, 韩学杰, 王丽颖. 中医临床实践指南共识专家遴选方法[J]. 北京中医药, 2021, 40(9): 1002-1004.
[18] 朱迪, 罗旭飞, 王子君, 等. 专家证据、专家意见及专家共识在指南制订中的区别与联系[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(4): 936-941.
Zhu D, Luo XF, Wang ZJ, et al. The differences and connections among expert evidence, expert opinion and expert consensus in the development of guidelines[J]. Med J Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, 2024, 15(4): 936-941.

基金

2023年度湖北省重点实验室开放项目-软科学项目(2023KFRKXO9)。

PDF(2325 KB)

61

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/