Abstract：Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of different ultrasound guidance approaches in internal jugular venous catheterization in hemodialysis patients. Methods Altogether 330 cases of renal disease patients who were treated with hemodialysis catheterization were divided averagely and randomly into three groups (110 patients in each group): Blind Puncture Group, Ultrasound Positioning Group and Ultrasound Guidance Group. The traditional blind puncture, ultrasound positioning for puncture and ultrasound-guided puncture were adopted in three groups respectively so as to make comparisons of the advantages and disadvantages between three guidance approaches. Results The Ultrasound Guidance Group gave a better demonstration of the full process of guidewire and catheter introduction, whereas the Ultrasound Positioning Group could display the location of internal jugular vein blood vessels more accurately. Conclusion This new ultrasound-guided catheterization with transection for positioning and length cutting for needle insertion had revealed its effectiveness in less complications and surgical time as well as the higher success rate in contrast with the traditional blind puncture approach, which deserved wider clinical promotion.
唐莉. 颈内静脉血透导管置管术中不同超声引导方式比较[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2015, 30(8): 122-124.
TANG Li. Comparisons of Different Ultrasound Guidance Approaches in Internal Jugular Venous Catheterization in Hemodialysis Patients. China Medical Devices, 2015, 30(8): 122-124.
